May 1, 2026
Screenshot_20250704-091744-1

BREAKING NEWS: I didn’t left Man United because of the arrival of Benjamin sesko,I left because of this particular player,He was the one that pushed me away and not sesko”, Rasmus hujlund reveals the ONE Man United player that pushed him away from the club

You might think Manchester United had to sell Rasmus Hojlund because of the whole Not Being Good Enough thing, but apparently not…

Samuel Luckhurst and Luke Edwards are engaged in an infernal battle to be crowned just the bestest football journalist around.

But first, a whole load of guesswork about Declan Rice’s upcoming Champions League ban.

Rice is cooked
In quite literally the closing line of the 13th and final paragraph of a story on Arsenal contemplating lodging some pitch-based complaints to UEFA, John Cross of the Daily Mirror writes:

‘Gunners midfielder Declan Rice claimed on TV that the referee might have been influenced by the home crowd and, while that could imply bias under Premier League rules, it would be most unusual for UEFA to step in.’

It would be ‘most unusual indeed’. Yet of course the Mirror website reports ‘Arsenal star Declan Rice facing Champions League punishment as UEFA launch probe’.

‘UEFA launch probe’ is immediately downgraded to ‘UEFA are set to investigate’ in the opening paragraph. And even that is a stretch: they’ll review the referee’s match report before deciding whether Rice saying referee Danny Makkelie was “provoked” into changing his mind by the home fans is worthy of any action being taken.

There is no ‘probe’ or ‘investigation’ yet, and indeed there might not be at all.

It is said that UEFA ‘could hit him with a ban’, but even that is reduced to ‘but a ban has not been ruled out’ later in the same article.

Quite who is in a position to not rule out a ban is unknown. ‘It would be most unusual for UEFA to step in,’ but downright bizarre if someone broke ranks to say Rice won’t be banned before it’s even decided whether he’ll face any sanction whatsoever.

Hit the Dec
Of course, where one leads, others must follow:

‘Declan Rice risks Uefa rap after referee rant following Arsenal’s controversial Champions League draw at Atletico’ – The Sun.

‘Declan Rice faces Champions League punishment as UEFA investigate Arsenal star’ – Daily Express website.

‘Explained: Will UEFA ban Declan Rice for comments after Atletico draw?’ – Sky Sports.

The guesswork and complete lack of clarity in each story is summed up succinctly by this line from a football.london explainer about how Rice and Arsenal are ‘sweating over potential ban as UEFA verdict on referee blast to come’:

‘John Cross writes for the Mirror, football.london’s sister title, that Rice would could have been sanctioned by the Premier League if his comments were made after a domestic top flight game.’

Cheers for clearing that up for everyone.

And by the way, this Rice ‘rant’/’blast’ has to be seen to be believed:

View this post on Instagram
Sod a UEFA ban; the man deserves a prison sentence.

Hello Digne, you’re a stupid head
Nottingham Forest beat Aston Villa on Thursday evening in a game with precious few talking points beyond a lovely Emi Martinez save and some more hilarious defending from Lucas Digne.

But the ubiquity of VAR dictates that every match report from now until the end of time must hint at some massive controversy, and Martin Lipton of The Sun does not disappoint:

‘ANOTHER Uefa semi-final, another contentious spot-kick decision, another VAR call that stunned one team and delighted the other.’

Lipton goes on to write that the fact Lucas Digne handled Omari Hutchinson’s cross ‘was not in doubt – the Frenchman had two arms raised above his head as he batted it away’.

‘Hutchinson, though,’ he continues, ‘appeared to have got there a fraction too late, with the flag raised for a goal kick, before the Portuguese VAR eventually informed fellow countryman Joao Pinheiro that it had not completely gone over the dead-ball line.’

So the only point of contention in an otherwise straightforward decision was clarified quickly and easily? That it ‘would never have been awarded back in the days when Brian Clough was in charge around here’ is, if anything, testament to VAR rather than a lament for the good old days; it was a clear penalty.

There was no sense of Villa injustice whatsoever. Emery completely brushed past it in his post-match interview. The only thing they might be ‘stunned’ by is Digne’s continued difficulty in grasping the concept of handball.

Weird and wonderful
‘VAR intervenes in Nottingham Forest v Aston Villa to award penalty after bizarre incident’ – Daily Mirror website.

The ‘bizarre incident’ being that the ball was initially ruled to have gone out of play, only for a check to deduce it hadn’t.

How outlandish.

As Luck would have it
The self-importance of The Sun‘s Samuel Luckhurst officially knows precisely no bounds.

In a comprehensive column detailing the players Manchester United must offload this summer, Luckhurst writes of Rasmus Hojlund that he ‘bombed as a Premier League No. 9’, was guilty of ‘undermining’ Ruben Amorim and his ‘tone-deaf and crass social media posts that played up to lad culture were unbecoming’.

Then comes the killer insider line:

‘During an evening stroll around Chicago, Hojlund caught up with team-mates Harry Maguire, Bruno Fernandes and Luke Shaw to alert them to this correspondent coincidentally walking behind them.

‘Fernandes and Shaw did not break stride. Maguire said hello. That is another reason why they’re still at United and Hojlund isn’t.

‘He had to get the boot.’

Yeah, sod the 26 goals in 95 games and general difficulty in acclimatising to a new team, league, manager and level of expectation. Hojlund simply ‘had to get the boot’ because he disrespected Samuel sodding Luckhurst.

Get in there and make it all about you, fella. At least he didn’t make up a quote this time.

Howe about that?
Behold, the latest Eddie Howe update from Luke Edwards of the Daily Telegraph:

‘From speaking to people this morning there is a strong push back on any sense these were crunch talks and the manager had to convince people he remains the right man for the job.

‘But managers are always judged on results and Howe needs to win some games or a decision will need to be made in the summer.

‘At the moment the view is there isn’t a decision to be made. Howe is the manager and will be next season.’

So Howe needs to win some games or a decision will need to be made in the summer, but currently a decision doesn’t need to be made despite Newcastle having not won and indeed very specifically lost their last five matches.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!